
28th March 2008, 09:15 PM
|
 |
Talk Angling Senior Member
Done a Ton
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: west mids
Posts: 160
|
|
For heavens sake dont go for the matchbox. Imagine how stupid you will look as it didnt cost you £700  It was only developed by clint elliott and what the hell as he ever won. Wonder what he is doing now? Probably working on some tin pot holiday park as his box wasn't good enough to compare with rive  Get yourself the all singing and dancing rive and you will be the main man  Spending all that money to sit down really makes you a better angler  I shouldn't even be replying to this thread as I can only afford a brilo and they only sell those to sub standard anglers so avoid them at all costs  How dare I have an opinion and compare another box to rive. Shame on me. Never leave the house again   
|

28th March 2008, 09:35 PM
|
 |
Canal Angler but does a bit of Carping
Talk Angling Life Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: halesowen
Posts: 504
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian G
The prime requirement of a box is that you are comfortable on it and with it, the cost surely is unimportant. Just because something costs double what another product does not make it the right choice for every angler and I have yet to see anyone truely justify why a Rive box is better than a Milo or a Milo better than a Matchbox etc, much the same can be said about other items of tackle, one of the anglers in my club aint got a Tourny Pro or a Rive or any other often highly rated gear, but he does catch fish and has held the record weights at many venues I guess he must be happy with what he uses.
|
What a pull round
__________________
Team Mosella Black Country
|

28th March 2008, 09:37 PM
|
|
Club Member
Registered member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 25
|
|
totally agree with you brian, the most expensive pole,box or rod may be lighter,comfier and better looking but its water craft and knowledge that will catch you more fish.
|

28th March 2008, 10:02 PM
|
|
Talk Angling Senior Member
Done a Ton
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sedgley
Posts: 129
|
|
Having a Rive doesnt make you a better angler, nor does having the best pole. I would never have paid the true rrp of my rive £1500.00. Its a shame the bloke I brought it off had more money than sense. He then went on to buy the brand new milo which he is now selling because shock there is a new rive out.
I was happy to keep fishing on my 10 year old boss box, until my mate told me how much he wanted for it, and the fact that he had only used it 17 times due to spending 6 months in asia every year.
Lets put it like this, when you get on a rive you can see why they cost so much and sell alot. Its an awsome seat box ahead of anything in the field, why is every tackle company robbing the rive frame, and getting them made in china at a smaller price because they no its the market leader.
I think any angler who has match fished for a period of time, will have been battered of the next peg by an angler who has a wicker basket a £10 rod, £2 reel etc. Is that not the beauty of our sport that you dont have to spend £1,000.00s to compete.
__________________
Team Mosella Black Country
Goodrich Fordhouses - Baggeridge AC
|

28th March 2008, 10:12 PM
|
 |
Administrator
Talk Angling Life Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 1,929
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rive t
What a pull round
|
Not a pull round Tony, but it does my head in when the only justification that is given, when recommending tackle is that it costs the most, that is not the prime consideration for me, I am sorry to say that this country has fell into a designer/brand culture and if it aint got the right logo on it it must be crap, well thats not for me, my purchases of any item be it tackle or clothing or electrical goods are based on the same criteria does it do the job is it value for money will it last. The only purchases I have made that were brand dictated were motor cars when I worked for Rover, I would have been stupid to have purchased a Nissan or a Ford.
Now convince me why I should purchase a Rive box, but dont use the reasoning of its costs the most. Now thats a pull round  
__________________
|

29th March 2008, 08:11 PM
|
 |
Canal Angler but does a bit of Carping
Talk Angling Life Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: halesowen
Posts: 504
|
|
__________________
Team Mosella Black Country
|

29th March 2008, 09:01 PM
|
|
Talk Angling Senior Member
Double Ton
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 239
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian G
Not a pull round Tony, but it does my head in when the only justification that is given, when recommending tackle is that it costs the most, that is not the prime consideration for me, I am sorry to say that this country has fell into a designer/brand culture and if it ain't got the right logo on it it must be crap, well that's not for me, my purchases of any item be it tackle or clothing or electrical goods are based on the same criteria does it do the job is it value for money will it last. The only purchases I have made that were brand dictated were motor cars when I worked for Rover, I would have been stupid to have purchased a Nissan or a Ford.
Now convince me why I should purchase a Rive box, but dont use the reasoning of its costs the most. Now that's a pull round  
|
With all due respect Brian , I've read through all the posts and nobody had said to get a Rive because their the most expensive , its peoples opinions after using the product and finding that they suit there needs . I certainly agree that they dont make you a better angler but what they do is make you more efficient and that will put more fish in your net over the course of a season . From owning an AS1 box to a rive is a massive leap and until you have used one on a few sessions you really dont appreciate the difference they make , you dont get the likes of Nuddy and scotthorne etc using them just because their nice to sit on .
|

31st March 2008, 08:53 AM
|
 |
Talk Angling Senior Member
Done a Ton
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: west mids
Posts: 160
|
|
You get the likes of nuddy and scotthorne using them because they are free!
If they had to fork out for one they would probably shop around. Des shipp uses the preston box and he is a top top angler. Doesnt mean his box makes him that because he was still a top top angler with his old box. That goes for all the top anglers. It is skill, knowledge and watercraft that makes that. 
|

31st March 2008, 09:24 AM
|
 |
Talk Angling Senior Member
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: west midlands
Posts: 302
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by big g
You get the likes of nuddy and scotthorne using them because they are free!
If they had to fork out for one they would probably shop around. Des shipp uses the preston box and he is a top top angler. Doesnt mean his box makes him that because he was still a top top angler with his old box. That goes for all the top anglers. It is skill, knowledge and watercraft that makes that.
I think you will find that niether of those anglers are sponcered by rive they would of bought it fair and square , i would say that in many situations a box is a box but its the times that you need stability and so on that really sets the rive ahead by miles i have had both matchbox and rive and would only buy another rive as its by far the best box out there
__________________
I wanna go back to Stafford Moor
__________________
I want an end peg
|

31st March 2008, 06:03 PM
|
|
Club Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 8
|
|
steve ringer had a matchbox and thought it was the dogs danglies but......... hes now the proud owner of a rive st which he says is the best box hes had wouldnt swap it for any other. He was influenced by Alan scotthorne so guess the main man wasnt using it cos it was a freebie but because in his expert opinion it was the BEST!
i rest my case your honour
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:16 AM.
|