Hi all,
whilst i appreciate that everyone nowadays seem to use hooklengths of around 6 inches in length, i cant help but think that this must create a much thicker section of line where the loops are which is positioned right in the eyeline of the feeding fish (in effect, double the thickness of your mainline)????????
As i say, i understand that most people do this (even Alan Scotthorne and he dont do too bad does he?) but as i say, i always have more confidence in my rigs when i either fish straight through or have a hooklength of around a foot as opposed to 6 inches.
I am just interested to hear if any of you have had any similar thoughts?
whilst i appreciate that everyone nowadays seem to use hooklengths of around 6 inches in length, i cant help but think that this must create a much thicker section of line where the loops are which is positioned right in the eyeline of the feeding fish (in effect, double the thickness of your mainline)????????
As i say, i understand that most people do this (even Alan Scotthorne and he dont do too bad does he?) but as i say, i always have more confidence in my rigs when i either fish straight through or have a hooklength of around a foot as opposed to 6 inches.
I am just interested to hear if any of you have had any similar thoughts?
Comment